NB: I was surprised to see that cancellations and refunds are not allowed if you subscribe via amazon.com -we've always offered a full refund to anyone not happy with their subscription. Just goes to show that the best way to subscribe is directly:
Showing posts with label 5280 magazine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 5280 magazine. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 3, 2014
On Spec
NB: I was surprised to see that cancellations and refunds are not allowed if you subscribe via amazon.com -we've always offered a full refund to anyone not happy with their subscription. Just goes to show that the best way to subscribe is directly:
Friday, October 31, 2014
Welcome to Ukraine
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
House: Design Architecture Lifestyle
Magazine: REALLY BAD
Amazon Customer Service: EXCELLENT
Buy House: Design Architecture Lifestyle Now
I got this magazine at a discount rate, hoping to see different ideas to design and upgrade rooms because home decorating is not my forte. This magazine is full of pictures of homes and products that cost HUGE amounts of money. I gave it two stars only because the right audience might find it inspiringperhaps upcoming architects or insanely rich people who have no idea how to decorate? No one I know could come close to actually affording the lavish home and room decor featured in the articles and ads. If you don't make millions per year, I don't think this mag will appeal unless you are someone who is entertained by merely seeing the homes of extremely rich people. Personally, I honestly put it in the recycling bin as soon as it comes, because there is nothing in this magazine that I can relate to or remotely afford. (Even if I did have that kind of money, I can't imagine paying the insane prices listed on the items featured anyway.)Read Best Reviews of House: Design Architecture Lifestyle Here
This magazine is definitely not intended for working class folks. The designs and materials are quite extravagant. Makes me wonder who lives in these places.Want House: Design Architecture Lifestyle Discount?
This magazine pretty much went straight to the thrash as soon as it got to me. There is absolutely no useful info in the magazine. I'm very disappointed with the subscription. There are just too many ads. The content is like one of those free magazines that you can pick off the street.I tried to be a good citizen, asking them to stop sending me the magazine without a refund. But I still receive it in the mail. I feel bad about wasting the paper. Good thing is the subscription will end in March.
Friday, August 29, 2014
Reiki News Magazine
Don't miss the opportunity to improve your Reiki knowledge tenfold by subscribing to this treasure!The Reiki News Magazine provide comprehensive information for the practitioner. Articles are well written and easy to understand. I read my first issue cover-to-cover.
Even though this is a quarterly journal, I recieved the most recent copy instead of having to wait until the next publication date. It was a nice touch by the magazine!
I would recommend this publication to both new and experienced practitioners of Reiki.While I agree there are some very good articles, I find this magazine to be way too promotional with most of the promotions pointing to RAND products and classes. The overpromoting overshadows the articles. Not worth the money to me.This magazine has great articles, lets me know what's going on with Reiki and keeps me on track with my own practice.
Tuesday, June 3, 2014
Vanity Fair July 2007 Africa Issue, Cheadle/Iman Cover
I love reading about the stars and their humane aspirations and endeavors. I hope the hopefulness plays out to be real.I read an article a day with morning coffee and pray. I also have ordered some copies for friends from Africa.I wish I had bought 10 copies at the News stand. Now I'm ordering "old copies" from Amazon--
Thanks, VF, Bono, and Amazon.
Saturday, May 31, 2014
Self (1-year auto-renewal)
Buy Self (1-year auto-renewal) Now
My Self subscription started when Women's Sports & Fitness was cancelled. While it's not quite as athletic as that magazine was, Self has an extra emphasis on participation rather than competition. They use "reader models" in a lot of their photo spreads, and really emphasize the idea of a healthy and strong body, over an idealized "fashion model" body. Articles discuss the latest gym class crazes, nutrition and supplement breakthroughs, and debunking of fad diets. They do include some fashion (focus on workout apparel) and makeup (emphasis on natural look and healthy skin) info, but this is not a foo-foo Cosmo magazine. There are healthy recipes, workout plans targeting a new body part monthly, and creative ways to workout outside the gym as well as inside. Overall, this magazine focuses on real women's lives and how to make them healthier, happier, and more fit. There's a lot of practical advice here that is very applicable to most people's lives.Read Best Reviews of Self (1-year auto-renewal) Here
Self what? The entire magazine now pushes product on every inch of every page. Their product placements went from "convenient and subtle" to obviously pandering to their revenue sources. Plus the stories and tips are so far out of reality that anyone over 25 with half of a brain couldn't relate. I once enjoyed Self and their monthly self-help plans. Their core message has gotten lost in the sea of product pushing.Want Self (1-year auto-renewal) Discount?
I've been a Self subscriber for two years, and I just cancelled subscription. At first, I loved the magazine because it offers lots of nutritional advice, and the Self Challenge, which starts in March, is really helpful for starting an exercise routine.However, after two years, I've noticed the following:
Content tends to repeat over and over. If you subscribe, you'll really only need one year to get the gist of what they'll say every month.
Too much emphasis on statistics. I tried to count the number of studies Self referenced in one issue, and lost count because ther were so many.
Too much editorializing on social issues. I don't like being preached at in the name of "women's health," but that's just my personal opinion.
Not enough discussion of exercises to do at the gym. If you don't have a gym membership, Self is great at providing exercises you can do at home. But there's almost no discussion of how to effectively use weight lifting machines, or even free and hand weights.
All in all, a pretty decent magazine. But not good enough for a renewal for a third year!
Sunday, March 2, 2014
Portals of Prayer - Large Print ed
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
Discovery Girls (1-year)
I is so nice to see someone publishing a magazine where teen girls are presented as wholesome, age-appropriate teen girls and not as exploited, skin-bearing women. I had been hoping for years for a magazine like this. Discovery Girls is packed with topics appealing to teens. The layout is vivid and attracting. If you are concerned about content and role models for teen girls then this is the magazine you have been waiting for.
Buy Discovery Girls (1-year) Now
I've gotten about half a dozen issues of Discovery Girls, and every time I finished reading it, I came away dissapointed. The way DG writes sounds like a popular girl or an MTV show host talking. Discovery Girls focuses far too much on boys, fashion, makeup, and celebrities. It says right on the cover, "A Magazine for girls ages 7 and up." I know that when I was 7, I did not even think about dating boys, wearing makeup, how cool my clothes were, or whether I owned the latest CD by a singer. However, Discovery Girls puts little or sometimes even no focus on more important elements in life, such as school and family. I have found that DG even subtly hints that school and family are not important. For example, I quote, "an endless day of school" and "your parents had less complicated lives when they were tweens, so do they understand all that you're going through?" which disgusted me immensly. When school is mentioned, it is usually a page of advice on what do if a friend is going boy-crazy, or a "crash-course lesson on school supplies," which brings me to my next point.Discovery Girls is chock-full of advertisements that annoy me greatly. In addition, the "product reccomendation and reviews" pages reccomend the same products that were advertised. This leads me to believe that Discovery Girls does not geniunely think that the products they reccomend are worth buying; they simply are endorsing the products they are paid to advertize, which I find extremely misleading. The products they advertize are also pretty expensive, for example a small chest of drawers that cost over $60. This might trigger some girls into nagging their parents into buying them things that they just saw in a magazine and thought, "Well, if Discovery Girls thinks it's cool, then it's cool, so I want it!" which will be a waste of money for the parents.
One of the most disgusting parts of Discovery Girls magazine is that they often hint that there are only two types of girls: The high-fashion, glamorous actress who loves pink and purple, and the sporty, gym-class-loving athlete. I'm not exactly sure what they are trying to promote here, but there is only one word to describe what is going on here: STEREOTYPING. I find that utterly horrible, and especially in a magazine for girls ages 7 and up. This will make 7-year-olds believe that if they aren't glamorous or sporty, they will fade into oblivion. I know that for sure I am neither, and am having no pre-teenage crises at the moment because I do not conform to these standards. To further support my point, I will give one example that stands out in my mind: there was an issue that featured a craft article on locker decorating. Sounds pretty harmless. However, there were only two themes presented: the "glamor girl," whose theme was pink, purple, and fake jewels, and the "super sports star," whose theme comprised of soccer balls and fake medals. This made me feel incredibly happy to be who I was, seeing that I am in neither camp and yet still "mysteriously" managed to be happy and lead a decent life.
There is a "Spotlight on [name of sport]" in every issue, which can be interesting, right up to the point where there is a subheading reading "What you'll need." A few issues ago, the article was on basketball, and the "what you'll need" was all of expensive Nike shoes and sports equipment. Girls who read the article will subconsciously be pressured into thinking, "I play basketball. I need expensive name-brand clothes and sports equipment," which is absolutely not true. Moderately-priced sports clothing and equpiment will work just as well as the more pricey equipment. A couple dozen issues back, LIP GLOSS was advertized on the sports page! I think this was in a highly inappropriate place, seeing that there was a message saying, "Don't forget to wear Lip Smackers lip balm while you're playing tennis!" That was the most shocking part of it. It was totally obvious that Smackers paid Discovery Girls to endorse their product, which is highly dissapointing. Plus, the "What you'll need" does not even need to be there. I am perfectly confident in saying that girls ages 7 and up know that you need a basketball and shoes to play basketball!
As my mom sometimes says, kids and teenagers are "the blind leading the blind." Discovery Girls has advice pages, but the advice is written by girls ages 7-12. Now, I think some of the advice given is not very helpful, and girls reading the advice would be better off asking a parent or trusted adult for advice. If the problem is so serious that it is worth it to send the problem in to a magazine and get it published to get advice, I think the advice should come from a responsible adult, or at least be better.
In addition, there is always a "fashion" section in the magazine, which spans over a few pages, bearing pictures of blondes wearing name-brand clothes and thumbnails of jewelry, accessories, and high-fashion items. I think that tweens are exposed enough to pop culture and are pressured daily at school to wear makeup and buy high-fashion, expensive clothes. Why promote it more in a magazine? On the subject of clothes and fashion, the "Beauty" section does not promote makeup or shaving, but it does talk about hairstyles and other issues like that. This kind of topic may be well-suited for girls ages 10 and up, who are starting to be interested in things like that, but for 7-, 8and 9-year-olds? I think not. Girls that young don't need to worry about things like that yet; growing up happens too fast anyway. They should just enjoy the time they have to be a kid.
Overall, I do admit that once in a while I find an article or a quiz I enjoy reading that has a decent moral. However, the overall message the magazine gives to girls is one similar to fashion and gossip magazines, only translated into a language that girls 8 and up can understand. I don't reccomend it.
P.S.: Instead of Discovery Girls, I HIGHLY reccomend American Girl magazine... it's more appropriate, has NO ADVERTISEMENTS, well-written and fun to look at articles, good advice, and fun projects and crafts that are unique and don't look like they were found on the internet. American Girl is a far better magazine!
Friday, July 19, 2013
BBC History
Covers a wide array of topics, from medieval to WWI and WWII.
Very well written and researched.
I'm a loyal subscriberI do not know of a better magazine for world wide history articles. Even its small paragraphs are packed with important items. I look forward to receiving it each month.GREAT! This is the best for any lover of history. Studied the subject in college and really missed at good magazine that is all history. This one also includes historical subjects outside the British realm. Well researched, well written and much enjoyed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

