Showing posts with label weekly magazine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label weekly magazine. Show all posts
Sunday, December 7, 2014
Inventors Digest
Friday, December 5, 2014
Empire - England
Empire has the best letter editor quick reply page, best movie news section that is fairly reliable, some interesting actor introductions, then the SOLID MOVIE REVIEW SECTION that is pretty much the most effective appraised segment in any magazine on any planet and to think that it is about films makes it all the more better.
Film personality, editorial and staff movie trivia segments, inside scoops, Questions and Answers about how much is a bottle of milk, Empire helped get us closer to these people who made us so happy at the silver screen and to that I have Empire to thank. The spine quotes at the side that can win us a T-shirt, the new DVD section (I lived for the old VHS one) your designers really knew what made us young impressionably men do in the bathroom with Michelle Pfeiffer in the mid-section, thanks for that also and I end this review by saying that if there was any magazine in the world that I would like to write for, I would give my left one for these people.
This is truly amazing film work... and yeah, it does leave Premiere magazine to go pound on sand.
Try it.
Read Best Reviews of Empire - England Here
I am a loyal,long time fan of EMPIRE magazine and have collected almost every issue from No.1. Being a British mag, it differentiates itself from others like Premiere and Entertainment Weekly by it's frank dissection of all movies, and provides a wide range of opinion and discussion. I will always read EMPIRE, and If you like movies, you should too.Want Empire - England Discount?
If you are a movie fan looking for a read this is the magazine. Empire's strength is in treading a line between in-depth-analysis and shallow commercial puffs. In other words, it is not too serious yet again critical and independent.Ok, the p.o.v. is from UK so you might want to take that into account. Otherwise it is best magazine for movie aficionados I have read.
Thursday, October 9, 2014
Under The Radar
It starts off with some smaller interviews and Q&As, which still manage to be insightful as they interview people like Stephen Malkmus and Interpol. Then it's on to the major articles -in-depth studies of the bands and the individual people. But Under the Radar also delves into the background of the music, how the bands feel about their fans, the inspiration, the side projects, and much more.
Under the Radar also keeps an eye on the future: They cover future music releases by bands like Hot Hot Heat, the Doves, and Sparklehorse, as well as giving tabs on what other bands (Broken Social Scene) are doing in the limbo between albums. And of course -new bands! They offer some good looks into promising newcomers who are just starting out in the musical world.
The music-journalism world has undergone a bit of a revolution -commercialized, aging mags like Spin and Rolling Stone are being supplanted by smaller but more relevant magazines like Filter and the online Kludge. Under the Radar is one such magazine -except for frequency, there is nothing to complain about in this wonderfully in-depth, well-written exploration of good music -Modest Mouse, Dntel, Beta Band, Clinic, the Decemberists, Sun Kil Moon and much more.
Let's get this out of the way quickly -compared to most music magazines, Under the Radar comes out infrequently. As a result, if you pick it up in a bookstore, you may find that the "future releases" have already come out. However, the insightful content and all the music it can introduce you to are worth the wait.
The interviews are the best part of it all. The writing is calm, without the hyperactive, jokey wannabe-coolness that most magazines are infected with. The interviewers and columnists for Under the Radar are respectful and laid-back -no "about your girlfriend" questions, thankfully. In these interviews, the musicians seem relaxed and at ease, like they know they're in good hands. But they can also be solemn -in the sixth issue, Marcus Kagler gives a poignant tribute to the late Elliott Smith, remembering what Smith was like.
While still a relative newcomer, Under the Radar shows that it it should be up there with Mojo and Filter as a must-have for music geeks. Toss out your copies of Rolling Stone and pick up Under the Radar instead.Under the Radar might be the best American music magazine around these days. The writing and photography is great, and the layout and overall quality of the mag just gets better with each issue. If you're into indie-rock then you're bound to love at least some of the bands they've covered, they seem to interview almost everybody. They squeeze so many amazing bands into each issue. My only complaint is that is doesn't come out more regularly.
I've sampled a lot of indie-rock mags, and Under the Radar is definitely more ahead of the curve than indie magazines like Amplifier, Rockpile, Big Takeover, Resonance etc. (all worthy music mags) or than bigger mags like Rolling Stone, Spin, Filter, Blender etc. Most of my new favorite bands in the last year or two were discovered through Under the Radar, then a couple of months later I'd start reading about some of those bands in other music mags. Via Under the Radar I first discovered bands like The Thrills, The Sleepy Jackson, Mew, The Streets, Rilo Kiley, Clearlake, British Sea Power, Interpol, The Polyphonic Spree, The Dears, The Velvet Teen, Yeah Yeah Yeahs, TV On the Radio, Electrelane, Hot Hot Heat, Elbow, stellastarr*, The Shins, and the list goes on. Plus their articles on bigger bands are usually more in-depth than other US music mags. They've done great articles on Black Rebel Motorcycle Club, Spiritualized, Modest Mouse, Death Cab for Cutie, Belle & Sebastian, The Flaming Lips, Blur, Super Furry Animals, Bright Eyes, Ride, Badly Drawn Boy, Broken Social Scene, etc. etc. And they were the last magazine to interview Elliott Smith before he died because they were the only ones who bothered to track him down and catch up with him. The photography is usually great too. For ahwile I wasn't into the layout, but they've really improved on that with the last couple of issues. There are other music mags that I buy too, like Devil In the Woods, Magnet and Big Takeover, but Under the Radar is the one I trust the most.Here's a tip. Subscribe to this rag directly through Under the Radar's website and you'll get to choose from a selection of free CDs. These aren't compilations, but actual albums from new indie artists. In many cases, the CD costs more than the subscription, which is still a meager $12.50. There's no sense in purchasing this magazine through Amazon and losing out on the bargain.
Current CD selections include:
Bright Eyes/Neva Dinova: One Jug of Wine, Two Vessels
Caribou: Swim
Casio Kids: Topp Stemning På Lokal Bar
Dr. Dog: Shame, Shame
Gayngs: Relayted
Here We Go Magic: Pigeons
Sharon Jones & The Dap Kings: I Learned the Hard Way
Jamie Lidell: Compass
Steve Mason: Boys Outside
Plants and Animals: La La Land
Read Best Reviews of Under The Radar Here
Now i dont usually write reviews for things, but when i do its because i really like it or i really hate it. And i must say this is one of the best, if not the best music magazine out there. But before you go on if you like bands like simple plan or new found glory just stop and go read something else. this magazine is for indie rock fans or just plain rock. They give you reviews on at least 30 albums and have great interviews with artists. Now this is not like "Spin" who jumps on anything that is popular at the moment to make some money. I enjoyed reading this summers issue ( with Death Cab for Cutie on the front) so much that I ordered it the day i got the magazine. A must have for indie fans.Want Under The Radar Discount?
as a new subscriber i have only gotten one issue of under the radar. however the one issue i have recieved is fantastic. it has pages of great reviews and a very in-depth story on the cover artist. there is virtually no filler and there's page after page of stories on up and coming talent and lesser known musicians. this also isn't a magazine that you breeze through in 20 minutes and never look at again. my only complaint about this magazine is it's quarterly publication, i wish i could have one every month.under the radar is worth the money to subscribe
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Maine Antique Digest
Sunday, June 15, 2014
GM High - Tech Performance (1-year auto-renewal)
If you subscribe, Good Luck =)needs more pages but we love it!Lots of good tech,pictures and articles.Also wish it was a monthly magazine instead of every 2 months
Buy GM High - Tech Performance (1-year auto-renewal) Now
Gave myself a Christmas present with this subscription -I thought.Two calls a few months ago got me one issue. Now I'm 6 months into the "subscription." I'm going to try and get my money back.
Read Best Reviews of GM High - Tech Performance (1-year auto-renewal) Here
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
American Scientist
The writing, content, and timeliness of American Scientist is what SA used to be. I have nothing against SA but for the money I get better value with American Scientist. To sustain market share SA has had to make some compromises which may be a good thing IF it reaches a wider audience. But if you are even marginally literate in matters of science my choice would be American Scientist.Giving this magazine such a lofty epithet may seem a bit presumptuous, but for a non scientifically trained outsider this magazine offers a fresh and challenging look at the fast paced world of science that doesn't shy away from humor and the use of terms and ideas that may require its readers to go online and define a term. And in some cases it may inspire the reader to pick up a book on science by such greats as Hawking and Greene in order to better grasp some of the concepts dealing with time, space and atoms. This magazine isn't dumbed down. It includes well placed and efficient illustrations to help explain some of the more abstract points. It is not designed in the way popular magazinea are, in so much as they only touch upon a topic in the simplest manner and then move on before the audience is lost. Yet this magazine keeps the attention of the reader by combining explanatory notes that help people with no background knowledge have some grasp of the topic and by using humor and well written articles to clearly make their points.
For a magazine with a serious and well researched list of topics having small cartoons the likes of the New Yorker shows how comfortable this magazine is with itself. From the moment I picked up this magazine for the first time I felt like every word I read mattered and was worth my time to read. (Not true of many other magazines) American Scientist may not have the audience of Discover or National Geographic, nor is it as accessible as said titles, but for those with a true interest in science willing to challenge themselves and commit to real learning this magazine may be a perfect fit. At $4.95 it is certainly worth it to pick a copy on the news stand and try it out.
Read Best Reviews of American Scientist Here
After years of growing disgust with Scientific American (I've been a subscriber to Sci Am since 1975), I vented my frustration with SciAm by writing a scathing review on Amazon tonight. After writing the review, I perused the numerous other reviews from frustrated former SciAm lovers. Several of them recommended AmSci. I spent an hour checking out the AmSci website and I was hooked. I gave them my credit card and I am now a proud subscriber! Long live AmSci, good riddance to SciAm.Will update this review as often as needed. The only reason I gave it 4 out of 5 stars is because AmSci has only 6 issues a year not enough! Make it a monthly and I will raise my rating to 5 stars!
[Update Feb 27, 2011]
Now that my first print copy has arrived, I am glad to report that I am very, very pleased. Sci Am could learn a lot by looking at Am Sci. The magazine is dense! There is hardly any whitespace. Photos and illustrations are not full-page, but they add essential information. The articles are satisfying, thought-provoking and rigorous. Each one is written by a real, working scientist or full professor. I actually LEARNED things from this issue, instead of (as in the case of Sci Am), fuming about errors. And the book reviews! What a delight about 6 pages of reviews! Each review was thorough, detailed, and nearly a page long.
Instead of stupid politics, there was a great essay on ethics in science.
I still wish this was a monthly! I would gladly pay twice as much for 12 issues a year.
The contrast between AmSci and SciAm is extreme. My March issue of SciAm went largely unread; I have put it on the shelf without finishing it. When my current SciAm subscription lapses, I will not renew. Instead, I plan to donate what I would have spend on SciAm to AmSci!American Scientist is to Scientific American as polished gold is to golden polish. The former stands out for its quality, the latter for its shine.
Sunday, August 4, 2013
St Louis Magazine
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

